The Constitution in Wartime

The Constitution in Wartime

Beyond Alarmism and Complacency

  • Auteur: Tushnet, Mark; Devins, Neal; Graber, Mark A.; Brandon, Mark E.; Posner, Eric A.
  • Éditeur: Duke University Press
  • Collection: Constitutional Conflicts
  • ISBN: 9780822334569
  • eISBN Pdf: 9780822386902
  • Lieu de publication:  Durham , United States
  • Année de publication électronique: 2005
  • Mois : Janvier
  • Pages: 272
  • DDC: 342.73/0628
  • Langue: Anglais
Most recent discussion of the United States Constitution and war—both the war on terrorism and the war in Iraq—has been dominated by two diametrically opposed views: the alarmism of those who see many current policies as portending gross restrictions on American civil liberties, and the complacency of those who see these same policies as entirely reasonable accommodations to the new realities of national security. Whatever their contributions to the public discussion and policy-making processes, these voices contribute little to an understanding of the real constitutional issues raised by war. Providing the historical and legal context needed to assess competing claims, The Constitution in Wartime identifies and explains the complexities of the important constitutional issues brought to the fore by wartime actions and policies. Twelve prominent legal scholars and political scientists combine broad overviews of U.S. history and contemporary policy with detailed yet accessible analyses of legal issues of pressing concern today.

Some of the essays are broad in scope, reflecting on national character, patriotism, and political theory; exploring whether war and republican government are compatible; and considering in what sense we can be said to be in wartime circumstances today. Others are more specific, examining the roles of Congress, the presidency, the courts, and the international legal community. Throughout the collection, balanced, unbiased analysis leads to some surprising conclusions, one of which is that wartime conditions have sometimes increased, rather than curtailed, civil rights and civil liberties. For instance, during the cold war, government officials regarded measures aimed at expanding African Americans’ freedom at home as crucial to improving America’s image abroad.

Contributors. Sotirios Barber, Mark Brandon, James E. Fleming, Mark Graber, Samuel Issacharoff, David Luban, Richard H. Pildes, Eric Posner, Peter Spiro, William Michael Treanor, Mark Tushnet, Adrian Vermeule

  • Contents
  • Introduction
  • Part I
    • Mark E. Brandon: War and the American Constitutional Order
    • Mark Tushnet: Emergencies and the Idea of Constitutionalism
    • Eric A. Posner and Adrian Vermeule: Accomodating Emergencies
  • Part II
    • Mark A. Graber: Counter-Stories: Maintaining and Expanding Civil Liberties in Wartime
    • Mark Tushnet: Defending "Korematsu?" Reflections on Civil Liberties in Wartime
  • Part III
    • William Michael Treanor: The War Powers outside the Courts
    • Samuel Issacharoff and Richard H. Pildes: Between Civil Libtertarianism and Executive Unilateralism: An Institutional Process Approach to Rights during Wartime
    • Peter J. Spiro: Realizing Constitutional and International Norms in the Wake of September 11
  • Part IV
    • David Luban: The War on Terrorism and the End of Human Rights
    • Sotirios A. Barber and James E. Fleming: War, Crisis, and the Constitution
    • Mark Tushnet: Afterword: The Supreme Court's 2004 Decisions
  • About the Contributors
  • Index

Sujets

    SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER

    By subscribing, you accept our Privacy Policy